We’ve focused on what’s currently available in the market so if you need to implement (or are thinking about implementing) a counter-drone solution, then this is the resource for you.
Read on for an (almost entirely) unbiased look at the anti-drone market, including helpful pros and cons on each technology.
And we’ve even provided links to vendors for you. How’s that for helpful?
By the end of the page, you should have a good idea of what technology you need and what you don’t.
We’ve split all the tech into two categories: Monitoring Equipment and Countermeasures.
Drone Monitoring Equipment can be passive (simply looking or listening) or active (sending a signal out and analysing what comes back) and can perform several functions, including:
You should be aware that not all equipment performs all the above functionality at the same time. Detection means the technology can detect drones. Detection alone usually isn’t enough though. A radar that detects drones may also detect birds, for example.
That’s why classification is useful. Technology that classifies drones will usually be able to separate drones from other types of objects - like planes, trains, and automobiles, for example
One step further is identification. Some equipment can identify a particular model of drone, or even identify the drone’s or controller’s digital fingerprint, like a MAC address for example. This level of identification can be handy for prosecution purposes.
Being alerted that a drone is present somewhere in the vicinity is already useful. But your situational awareness, and ability to deploy countermeasures is greatly enhanced if you know the drone’s (and/or the controller’s) exact location. Some equipment will even allow you to track the drone location in real-time.
RF Analysers consist of one or more antennas to receive radio waves and a processor to analyse the RF spectrum. They’re used to try to detect radio communication between a drone and its controller.
Some systems can identify the more common drone makes and models, and some can even identify the MAC addresses of the drone and controller (if the drone uses Wi-Fi for communication). This is especially useful for prosecution purposes – proving that a particular drone and controller were active.
Some high-end systems can also triangulate the drone and its controller when using multiple radio units spread far apart.
Can be low cost, detects (and sometimes identifies) multiple drones and controllers, passive so no licence required, some can triangulate drone and controller position.
Doesn’t always locate and track drones, can’t detect autonomous drones, less effective in crowded RF areas, typically short range.
Usually, a microphone, or microphone array (lots of microphones), which detects the sound made by a drone and calculates a direction. More sets of microphone arrays can be used for rough triangulation.
Detects all drones within the near-field, including those operating autonomously (without (RF-emissions). Detects drones in the ground clutter where other technologies can struggle. Great gap-filler in areas outside line-of-sight of other sensors. Highly mobile and quickly deployable. Completely passive.
Doesn’t work as well in noisy environments, very short range (max. 300-500m)
Vendors include Squarehead Technologies.
Essentially a video camera. As well as standard daylight cameras, optical sensors can be infrared or thermal imaging.
Provides visuals on the drone and it’s (potential) payload, can record images as forensic evidence for use in eventual prosecution.
Difficult to use for detection by itself, high false-alarm rates, mostly poor performance in dark, fog, etc.
Too many to mention...
A device using radio energy to detect an object. Drone detection radar sends out a signal and receives the reflection, measuring direction and distance (position).
Most radars send their radio signal as a burst, then listen for the ‘echo’. Almost all radars are designed to NOT pick up small targets. They are designed for large object tracking, like passenger aircraft.
Pro: Long range, constant tracking, highly accurate localisation, can handle hundreds of targets simultaneously, can track all drones regardless of autonomous flight, independent of visual conditions (day, night, fog, etc.)
Cons: Detection range dependant on drone size, most do not distinguish birds from drones, requires transmission license and frequency check to prevent interference.
Vendors: Well, that’d be us then! But...
...we should probably point out here that our own Drone Detection Radar, ELVIRA®, is not like the standard radars described above.
First of all ELVIRA® is an FMCW radar. FMCW stands for Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave. What that means is that the radar is always sending and always receiving, which results in accurate and fast tracking with quick update rates.
But the really unique thing is that ELVIRA® is a micro-doppler radar.
Doppler radars are able to track moving objects and discard static objects so you won't see them on your screen. Nothing new there.
Micro-doppler radar, however, is able to detect movement - specifically, speed differences - within moving objects. And drones tend to have propellers which create a large spectrum of speed differences. Part of the propeller is moving towards you and part is moving away.
By using this technique our radar can identify drones easily, and, most importantly, distinguish drones from birds.
Countermeasures can be grouped as either:
It’s important to note that, although the technology is available, current regulations in most countries forbid the use of any of the following technologies to be used for neutralising drones. Exceptions are sometimes made for military or law enforcement agencies.
An RF Jammer is a static, mobile, or handheld device which transmits a large amount of RF energy towards the drone, masking the controller signal. This results in one of four scenarios, depending on the drone:
This device sends a new signal to the drone, replacing the communication with GPS satellites it uses for navigation. In this way, the drone is ‘spoofed’ into thinking it’s somewhere else.
By dynamically altering the GPS coordinates in real-time, the drone’s position can be controlled by the spoofer. Once control is gained the drone can be directed to a ‘safe zone’, for example.
Medium cost, non-kinetic neutralisation.
Short range, can affect (and jam) other radio communications.
Centum provides a GPS Spoofer.
High Power Microwave (HPM) devices generate an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) capable of disrupting electronic devices.
The EMP interferes with radio links and disrupts or even destroys the electronic circuitry in drones (plus any other electronic device within range) due to the damaging voltage and currents it creates.
HPM devices may include an antenna to focus the EMP in a certain direction, reducing potential collateral damage.
Within range, the drone can be stopped effectively, non-kinetic.
High cost, risk of unintentionally disrupting communications or destroying other electronic devices in the area, drone effectively switches off instantly falling uncontrolled to the ground.
Diehl Defence provides a HPEM solution.
Firing a net at a drone, or otherwise bringing a net into contact with a drone stops the drone by prohibiting the rotor blades. There are three main types:
Physically captures drone – good for forensics and prosecution, ground-launched net cannons are semi-automatic with high accuracy, drone deployed nets have long range, low risk of collateral damage.
Kinetic solution could result in debris depending on parachute options, drone deployed nets imprecise and long reload time, ground-launched nets have a short range.
A high-powered optical device which produces an extremely focused beam of light, or laser beam. The laser defeats the drone by destroying the structure and/or the electronics.
Eagles have been trained to capture small unmanned aircraft systems (SUAS) and commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) drones. Birds have been used for hunting by man for thousands of years.
This solution takes advantage of the natural hunting instincts of the eagles being used. This can be a low-tech solution but requires a lot of manpower for training (at least 1 year per bird) and for maintaining the birds of prey.
If the birds are available at your location, interception of the drone can be quick and accurate with low risk of collateral damage. There are many similarities with military working dog (MWD) teams and K9 training teams so they could potentially be operationalised for this solution.
Difficult to scale due to limited number of birds available, man-power intensive training and maintenance, birds could be a hazard themselves at airports.
Guard From Above delivers birds of prey and training.
It’s more than likely that the best counter-drone solution for you is going to be a mix of the above technologies. Which mix exactly? Well, that’s going to be dependent on your specific use case.
We work with several integrators all over the world who integrate our radars into modular counter-drone systems, so you don’t have to. This solves the headache of dealing with multiple vendors and means you don’t need to integrate different hardware and software together.
Talking about software; Command & Control (C2) software can make or break your counter-drone system. All the data from those different sensors and technologies need to be collected, processed and displayed in a user-friendly way that makes sense and is actionable.
So, it pays to make sure you’re getting a scalable, sensor-agnostic, and user-friendly C2 solution with your system.
Good examples of counter-drone C2 systems are ESG’s Taranis, and Operational Solutions’ FACE.
Robin Radar Systems
Laan van Waalhaven 355
T +31(0)8 8700 8700